Okay, doesn't have "early" either, I see.
If in intel-ucode, we often say (here) the microcode are not updated "early".
And make the claim (untrue) that other distros do not update their microcodes "early".
I do not have amd cpu processors now, so I really cannot tell if that updates "early".
Hope we have more feedback from other amd (cpu) users.
Maybe amd users on other distros can see the output from these other distros.
Maybe they have "early" in their output? 
abc, you solution fixed a similar problem for me in another question. I wasn't aware of the issue with Ubuntu and GRUB. So thanks. A nice, simple fix.
BTW, consider editing the first command to: sudo grub-install /dev/sdx . That will safeguard against someone accidentally installing GRUB on a drive they didn't want to modify. 
It never occurred to me to run dmesg | grep microcode on the ubuntu partition.
it almost the same output.
Ubuntu. >$ dmesg | grep microcode
[ 1.794853] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x07030105
[ 1.794865] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x07030105
[ 1.794957] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.01 tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk, Peter Oruba
Manjaro.>$ dmesg | grep microcode
[ 0.607806] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x07030105
[ 0.607824] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x07030105
[ 0.607919] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.2.
So may be "early" on both distro's..I also read somewhere that its possible that there is no revision.
As you said "feedback from other amd (cpu) users." would be helpful.
Yes, it certainly is. Thanks for the output from Ubuntu distro.
Yes, it is the same then.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
Forum kindly sponsored by
