[Testing Update] 2020-06-03 - Software-Center, Arc Themes, Linux 5.7, Firefox 77, Systemd 245.6

Normal, often Manjaro points them to the latest kernel after a few bug fix releases

1 Like

http://phb-crystal-ball.org/

2 Likes

Waow!

So XOrg is being updated. One has to be careful in of case using old NVIDIA drivers, which are related/connected to XOrg...

trying the testing update now..


ALL OK

Graphics:
  Device-1: NVIDIA GT215 [GeForce GT 240] driver: nvidia v: 340.108 
  bus ID: 08:00.0 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: nvidia 
  resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 240/PCIe/SSE2 v: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 340.108 
  direct render: Yes 

Looks like X.Org is still 1.20.
Warn us when it jumps to 1.21. :slightly_smiling_face:

@philm Some PyQt apps don't work with Qt 5.15 yet, including TortoiseHg.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/66887
The initial report of that bug isn't quite right. Antonio Rojas later commented

... no trace of qscintilla in the backtrace ...
The crash is in PyQt, please report upstream to riverbank.

Hope Qt 5.15 doesn't go to stable until that's fixed.

1 Like

compiz-manjaro has not been rebuilt against the new version of protobuf which results in ccsm not working and compiz ignoring the settings previously made there

Did you manually 5.10? When I check my Wine version it's still 5.9 and I did both the 05032020 and 05072020 testing updates.

I took the version Wine 5.10 from the Arch Linux repository:

https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=wine-staging&maintainer=&flagged=

1 Like

Excuse me. This is a problem with wine-staging 5.10, regardless of the kernel version. I was too hasty.

@freggel.doe: Seems there is a huge discussion going on regarding this problem. Can you check if some of your services have this After=network-online.target in them?

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/66908

Yup, I'm having an automount in my /etc/fstab with the x-systemd.requires=network-online.target option set like described in the second issue you mentioned.

Why do you have that? By upstream this is claimed to be utterly wrong. How was this added?

Added manually, intend was to autmount an nfs share after the network was available.
Will have to see what's the proper way to do this.

@freggel.doe Maybe chip into the discussion here:

For now I'll keep the revert until it is clear.

Upstream (systemd) has clarified documentation to explicitly mention these options as wrong.
Upstream ( arch) is reverting their own revert for the next systemd-build.

I will adjust that mount entry accordingly, there's no way around that.

My question was more: Did you add those network options by yourself or was it part of some provided systemd service files?

Ah. That entire entry was added manually including all options.

I guess it was done as per advice on the respective ArchWiki page. NFS article there has (d) such recommendation. I was a victim of this approach too.

This topic was automatically closed 15 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

Forum kindly sponsored by